<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Beatnic - just wondering &#187; openness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beatnic.co.uk/tag/openness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beatnic.co.uk</link>
	<description>Questions and observations from Nic Price. Curious about how things work and what it&#039;s like to use them.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 17:40:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The best response to abuses of openness is more openness</title>
		<link>http://www.beatnic.co.uk/2005/03/11/the-best-response-to-abuses-of-openness-is-more-openness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beatnic.co.uk/2005/03/11/the-best-response-to-abuses-of-openness-is-more-openness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 13:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nic Price</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorised]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Weinberger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How things work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beatnic.co.uk/2005/03/11/the-best-response-to-abuses-of-openness-is-more-openness/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This from David Weinberger via Euan: Open, transparent environments are more secure and more stable than closed, opaque ones. While Internet services can be interrupted, the Internet as a global system is ultimately resilient to attacks, even sophisticated and widely &#8230; <a href="http://www.beatnic.co.uk/2005/03/11/the-best-response-to-abuses-of-openness-is-more-openness/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This from <a href="http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/mtarchive/003767.html">David Weinberger</a> via <a href="http://theobvious.typepad.com/blog/2005/03/theres_more_whe.html">Euan</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<ol>
<li>Open, transparent environments are more secure and more stable than closed, opaque ones.</li>
<li>While Internet services can be interrupted, the Internet as a global system is ultimately resilient to attacks, even sophisticated and widely distributed ones.</li>
<li>The connectedness of the Internet – people talking with people – counters the divisiveness terrorists are trying to create.</li>
<li>The openness of the Internet may be exploited by terrorists, but as with democratic governments, openness minimizes the likelihood of terrorist acts and enables effective responses to terrorism. fertile ground&#8230;</li>
</ol>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beatnic.co.uk/2005/03/11/the-best-response-to-abuses-of-openness-is-more-openness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

