Blog Readability Test

I’ve just been having a bit of fun with this… The Blog Readability Test. What level of education is required to understand your blog? - as seen on David Cushman’s site.

Apparently you require a “high school” education to read this blog.

I haven’t dug around to see what, if any, algorithm is being used to calculate readability.

Rather worryingly when I put http://news.bbc.co.uk in it came back saying you needed to have a college postgrad education to read it, and to be able to read www.google.com you need to be a Genius. Something fishy going on there methinks.

TrackBack URI:
http://www.beatnic.co.uk/2007/11/09/blog-readability-test/trackback/

Comments »

[...] to Nic for the link.  He thinks there is something fishy going on.  Whatever, it’s a bit of [...]

Comment by David Cushman » 12 November 2007 10:50 am

Hi Nic, looks to me pretty much like the more content, the greater the IQ score (hence, wikipedia, google and bbc scoring genius!)

Comment by sam » 13 November 2007 1:33 pm

Have you seen the readability score you can get for your writing when using google docs?

Comment by Nic Price » 13 November 2007 1:49 pm

Sam, please elaborate!

Comment by sam » 13 November 2007 2:13 pm

create a google doc, paste in some text, file / wordcount, RH col are some readability scores, click the ? for more info.

PS Nice fav icon

Comment by Nic Price » 13 November 2007 5:26 pm

Interesting, I didn’t know about that thanks. I guess hiding it under Word Count doesn’t help.

I just tried it on a document I’d been drafting and got the following:

Counts
Words:  227
Characters (no spaces):  1364
Characters (with spaces):  1582
Paragraphs:  25
Sentences:  50
Pages (approximate):  2
Readability
Average sentences per paragraph:  2.00
Average words per sentence:  4.54
Average characters per word:  6.01
Average words per page:  113.50
Flesch Reading Ease: [?]  38.62
Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: [?]  9.00
Automated Readability Index: [?]  9.00

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)



Comment moderation is in use. Please do not submit your comment twice -- it will appear shortly.