<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who should you vote for?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beatnic.co.uk/2005/04/22/who-should-you-vote-for/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beatnic.co.uk/2005/04/22/who-should-you-vote-for/</link>
	<description>Observations and questions from Nic Price</description>
	<pubDate>Wed,  3 Dec 2008 08:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: wendy</title>
		<link>http://www.beatnic.co.uk/2005/04/22/who-should-you-vote-for/#comment-617</link>
		<dc:creator>wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 08:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beatnic.co.uk/2005/04/22/who-should-you-vote-for/#comment-617</guid>
		<description>I scored 90 on Lib.Dem and 88 on Greens so really the questionnaire hasn't really helped a lot with the dilemma I have.  Having been a Labour voter all my voting life it was interesting to see that I only scored 9.  I could have predicted -31 for Tories - in fact surprised it wasn't more!
Interesting exercise - feel some of the questions could be further refined as I found myself pressing neutral when I genuinely didn't really know what I thought.  And I'm not sure neutral is the same as don't know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I scored 90 on Lib.Dem and 88 on Greens so really the questionnaire hasn&#8217;t really helped a lot with the dilemma I have.  Having been a Labour voter all my voting life it was interesting to see that I only scored 9.  I could have predicted -31 for Tories - in fact surprised it wasn&#8217;t more!<br />
Interesting exercise - feel some of the questions could be further refined as I found myself pressing neutral when I genuinely didn&#8217;t really know what I thought.  And I&#8217;m not sure neutral is the same as don&#8217;t know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo</title>
		<link>http://www.beatnic.co.uk/2005/04/22/who-should-you-vote-for/#comment-580</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2005 20:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beatnic.co.uk/2005/04/22/who-should-you-vote-for/#comment-580</guid>
		<description>I got Lib Dem 54, Green 40 and UKIP 6, the others negative.  I have always voted Green in the past (and we've always lost), but known that I'm a Lib Dem at heart.  Bit worried about my secret partiality for UKIP, but hey, they're great fun.
I think that people who don't vote should be given more respect though.  In fact non-voters should be factored into constituency results so that it would be possible to return Nobody if non-votes beat the votes for an otherwise winning candidate.  This would reduce taxes because there would be (mercifully) fewer MPs.  
There would also be fewer lies, less hot air, a reduction in sleaze and, most importantly, a downturn in political complacency.
MAKE IT HAPPEN!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got Lib Dem 54, Green 40 and UKIP 6, the others negative.  I have always voted Green in the past (and we&#8217;ve always lost), but known that I&#8217;m a Lib Dem at heart.  Bit worried about my secret partiality for UKIP, but hey, they&#8217;re great fun.<br />
I think that people who don&#8217;t vote should be given more respect though.  In fact non-voters should be factored into constituency results so that it would be possible to return Nobody if non-votes beat the votes for an otherwise winning candidate.  This would reduce taxes because there would be (mercifully) fewer MPs.<br />
There would also be fewer lies, less hot air, a reduction in sleaze and, most importantly, a downturn in political complacency.<br />
MAKE IT HAPPEN!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
